|
Hi,
Say you have created an add-on that has a few extra translations for the plone domain. If this add-on only targets Plone 3 you should add the translations to the i18n directory. If this add-on only targets Plone 4 you should add the translations to the locales directory. See my blog about that from last year: http://maurits.vanrees.org/weblog/archive/2010/10/i18n-plone-4#extra-translations-for-an-existing-domain But what should an add-on author do when he wants to support both Plone 3 and Plone 4 in the same code base? My blog points to some dangers there. One option that works is to use the i18n directory and to conditionally register translations from the plonelocales directory when on Plone 4, like this: <i18n:registerTranslations directory="plonelocales" xmlns:zcml="http://namespaces.zope.org/zcml" zcml:condition="have plone-4" /> See the example in this revision of collective.sortmyfolder: http://dev.plone.org/browser/collective/collective.sortmyfolder/trunk/collective/sortmyfolder?rev=246304 Note that I removed it later because the plone domain was ultimately not needed in this package. And note that in this case we have a normal locales directory with translations for our own domain and this should *always* be registered, so we cannot add the plone domain translations there. An obvious downside to this approach is that plone domain translations are then done in two spots. Dutch plone translations would be both in i18n/collective.sortmyfolder-plone-nl.po and plonelocales/nl/LC_MESSAGES/plone.po. Picking one of those as the master and copying that to the other location works fine, as long as the plone specific headers are set in the po file, which i18ndude takes care of. Another option is of course to drop support for Plone 3 in that add-on and stick to the (plone)locales solution. If wanted you can add a note that it still works on Plone 3 except that it misses a few translations. Are there other options out there? BTW, I am considering the first approach for Products.PloneGlossary. If you care about your language in that package you should already take a look at trunk and update your po files (plone domain and ploneglossary domain), as I have cleaned things up two days ago. -- Maurits van Rees http://maurits.vanrees.org/ Web App Programmer at Zest Software: http://zestsoftware.nl "Logical thinking shows conclusively that logical thinking is inconclusive." - My summary of Gödel, Escher, Bach ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Plone-i18n mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-i18n |
|
Hi,
I thought that translations in i18n folder worked on both Plone 3 and 4, is it not the case? In Plone 4, the po files in the the i18n directory are loaded with the same engine as po files in the locales folder, right? It should merge translations if there is several po files with the same domain. If not, I think it's a bug. Vincent On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Maurits van Rees <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Plone-i18n mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-i18n |
|
Op 18-11-11 15:22, Vincent Fretin schreef:
> Hi, > > I thought that translations in i18n folder worked on both Plone 3 and 4, > is it not the case? > In Plone 4, the po files in the the i18n directory are loaded with the > same engine as po files in the locales folder, right? > It should merge translations if there is several po files with the same > domain. If not, I think it's a bug. An i18n directory still works in Plone 4. But when one or more locales directories have been registered for a domain, any po files for that domain in an i18n directory are ignored. Oh wait, I may have fooled myself. Translations for the plone domain in an i18n directory *are* picked up when the package is in the Products namespace. Hm, the same *should* probably be true for packages in a different namespace as long as you register the package in zcml: <five:registerPackage package="." /> But that is not the case. Seems a bug indeed. I will see if I can find out where the problem is. To test: - Make a checkout of this package, where I also did the change I described in my initial mail: https://svn.plone.org/svn/collective/collective.portlet.relateditems/trunk - Run the bootstrap and bin/buildout. - Comment out these lines in configure.zcml: <i18n:registerTranslations directory="plonelocales" zcml:condition="have plone-4" /> - Create a *Dutch* Plone Site, install the package. - Optionally create French translations and try it with those and commit them. :-) - Go to @@manage-portlets and see that there is a 'Related Items' portlet. - Revert the zcml change and restart Plone. - Now @@manage-portlets shows 'Gerelateerde items'. A fresh release of this package is welcome btw, in case any authors are following this list. I have sent a mail as well to kiorky. Cheers, -- Maurits van Rees http://maurits.vanrees.org/ Web App Programmer at Zest Software: http://zestsoftware.nl "Logical thinking shows conclusively that logical thinking is inconclusive." - My summary of Gödel, Escher, Bach ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Plone-i18n mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-i18n |
|
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Maurits van Rees <[hidden email]> wrote: Op 18-11-11 15:22, Vincent Fretin schreef: Ah! You're right, there is an issue here. Some translations in the plone domain in the i18n folder of plone.app.discussion doesn't show up in Plone 4.2, like the Commentators criteria and its description. :( Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Plone-i18n mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-i18n |
|
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Vincent Fretin <[hidden email]> wrote: Ah! You're right, there is an issue here. Some translations in the plone domain in the i18n folder of plone.app.discussion doesn't show up in Plone 4.2, like the Commentators criteria and its description. :( The translations do show up with plone.app.discussion 1.0b12 with Plone 4.0.9. The package does have <five:registerPackage package="." /> and the header of the po file didn't change. In Plone 4.1, it doesn't work. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Plone-i18n mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-i18n |
|
Op 18-11-11 23:49, Vincent Fretin schreef:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Vincent Fretin > <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > > Ah! You're right, there is an issue here. Some translations in the > plone domain in the i18n folder of plone.app.discussion doesn't show > up in Plone 4.2, like the Commentators criteria and its description. :( > > > The translations do show up with plone.app.discussion 1.0b12 with Plone > 4.0.9. The package does have <five:registerPackage package="." /> and > the header of the po file didn't change. In Plone 4.1, it doesn't work. Bingo. Products/CMFQuickInstallerTool/utils.py has the necessary code that should be used in PlacelessTranslationService too: try: # Zope 2.13+ from OFS.metaconfigure import get_registered_packages except ImportError: def get_registered_packages(): import Products return getattr(Products, '_registered_packages', ()) The old code is still used in the spot in PTS that wants to look for i18n directories in packages that have five:registerPackage. I will make the change. -- Maurits van Rees http://maurits.vanrees.org/ Web App Programmer at Zest Software: http://zestsoftware.nl "Logical thinking shows conclusively that logical thinking is inconclusive." - My summary of Gödel, Escher, Bach ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Plone-i18n mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-i18n |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
